Supreme Court: 9/11 detainees can't sue top US officialsJune 19, 2017 3:53pm

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Muslim men detained after the Sept. 11 attacks can't sue top U.S. law enforcement officials.

The justices by a 4-2 vote ended a long-running lawsuit against former Attorney General John Ashcroft, former FBI Director Robert Mueller and other top Bush administration officials. The suit was filed by Muslim men who were detained for months in harsh conditions in a Brooklyn jail after the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

They were seeking damages against Ashcroft, Mueller, former immigration chief James Ziglar and the man who ran the federal jail. A lower court still may re-examine claims against the jailer.

In his majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy noted that the case arose in the aftermath of the deadly attacks, when U.S. officials wanted to be sure that there were no other potential attackers in the country. The men who were arrested all were in the United States illegally, many having stayed past the expiration of a visa.

He also acknowledged that the men were treated badly.

"There is therefore a balance to be struck, in situations like this one, between deterring constitutional violations and freeing high officials to make the lawful decisions necessary to protect the Nation in times of great peril," Kennedy wrote. But Congress, not the courts, should set when top officials can be sued, Kennedy said.

The decision was the third in which the court has intervened and ruled for Ashcroft in lawsuits against him and others from Muslims who were arrested in the U.S. following the 2001 attacks.

In a dissent joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice Stephen Breyer said the ability to hold officials accountable is especially important in a time of war or national security emergency. "History warns of the risk to liberty in times of national crisis," Breyer said in a dissent he summarized aloud from the bench Monday.

Only six of the nine justices were eligible to take part in the case. Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor had been involved in earlier stages of the lawsuit, before they were on the court. Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the court nearly three months after the case was argued.

Page 1 of 1

More Stories Like This

FILE - This Jan. 25, 2012, file photo, shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington. The Supreme Court has almost certainly decided what to do about President Donald Trump’s travel ban affecting citizens of six mostly Muslim countries. The country is waiting for the court to make its decision public about the biggest legal controversy in the first five months of Trump’s presidency. The issue has been tied up in the courts since Trump’s original order in January sparked widespread protests just days after he took office. The justices met June 22, 2017, for their last regularly scheduled private meeting in June.(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
Supreme Court could reveal action on travel ban at any time
FILE - This Jan. 25, 2012, file photo, shows the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington. The Supreme Court enters its final week of work before a long summer hiatus with action expected on the Trump administration’s travel ban and a decision due in a separation of church and state case that arises from a Missouri church playground. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
Big cases, retirement rumors as Supreme Court nears finish
Vice President Mike Pence and his wife, Karen, arrive at Peterson Air Force Base on Air Force Two Friday, June 23, 2017, during his visit to Colorado Springs, Colo. (Christian Murdock/The Gazette via AP)
Pence visits Focus on Family amid change for religious right
Justice Department backs Texas 'sanctuary city' law in courtThe Trump administration is backing a Texas "sanctuary city" crackdown in court ahead of a federal judge deciding whether to put the new law on hold
Federal judge orders pretrial release of terror suspectA federal judge has ordered the release of a man who has been detained for 5½ years after being accused of providing support to terror group
Clue to Gorsuch's ideology seen in pairings with ThomasGorsuch's willingness to join Thomas in separate and dissenting opinions offers an early clue to his ideology on the high court
This component is currently unavailable.

Related Searches

Related Searches